Form Follows Function: What Elite Sport Can Teach Us About Building the Body for Performance

Form Follows Function: What Elite Sport Can Teach Us About Building the Body for Performance

Form Follows Function: What Elite Sport Can Teach Us About Building the Body for Performance

The phrase “form follows function” was coined by architect Louis Sullivan in the late 1800s. He wasn’t talking about athletes — he was talking about buildings. But the core principle remains true across disciplines: the shape of something reflects its intended purpose.

Nowhere is that more evident than in elite sport.

In high-level athletic performance, the body doesn’t evolve for aesthetics. It adapts to survive, to compete, and to win. Over time, the way an athlete moves, lifts, and even looks becomes a by-product of the functional demands placed on them. Their form — their physique, structure, proportions, and even posture — reflects the function they’ve trained to perform.

This isn’t an aesthetic conversation. It’s not about who looks the most shredded on Instagram or who fits into society’s narrow definitions of health or beauty. This is about honest, practical sport science — and what we can learn from the patterns we see at the highest levels of performance.

Performance Demands Shape the Body

If you spend long enough training for a specific sport, your body will start to change in ways that support your output. That might mean building more upper back mass for yoke stability, developing short-range pressing power for log clean and press, or increasing tissue density in the glutes and hamstrings to survive deadlift and loading events. None of these adaptations are accidental.

At the elite level, we begin to see clear and repeatable trends in structure and presentation. Wrestlers across weight classes tend to share broad backs, thick necks, and a stocky, explosive build. Olympic lifters converge around compact leverages, short femurs, and huge trunk musculature. Throwers are built like tanks. Gymnasts are lean and tight, built for rotation and stability.

These aren't accidents. They're the result of what wins, over and over again.

Of course, there are outliers. But high-level sport doesn’t reward randomness. It rewards repeatable physical traits that help you do the job — under pressure, at speed, and with maximal intent.

You Can't Escape Physics

If you’re constantly fighting your own levers or carrying more body fat than the movement economy allows, you’re working at a disadvantage. That’s not a moral failing — it’s a technical and strategic problem. It’s coachable.

In strength sport, especially, we see this when lifters try to force performance into the wrong weight class. They’re either undersized and under-muscled, or oversized and underpowered. The result is usually frustration, injury, or plateau.

Understanding how your structure — limb length, joint orientation, muscle insertions — affects performance is the first step toward training with your body instead of constantly fighting it.

Hypertrophy with Purpose

It’s easy to forget that size still matters. Muscle mass isn't just for show. It's a performance driver. It protects joints, provides mechanical advantage, increases force output, and supports resilience across long training cycles.

But effective hypertrophy for athletes isn’t just about lifting heavy and eating big. It needs to be:

• Joint-specific: Target weak links and improve muscular balance.

• Functionally integrated: Mass should serve a purpose — think upper back density for yoke carry or trunk mass for stone loading.

• Recovery-aware: More size means more tissue to recover — smart nutrition, sleep, and GPP need to scale with muscle gain.

• Time-sensitive: There’s a time and place for chasing size. Off-season is your best window to push hypertrophy aggressively while keeping sport skill sharp.

When hypertrophy is built around the demands of your sport, not the demands of your ego, it becomes a performance tool — not a distraction.

Self-Awareness > Aesthetic Pressure

Let’s be clear: this isn't about telling anyone they’re in the wrong body for sport. It's about helping you understand what the sport asks of you — and then giving you the tools to meet it on your terms.

If you want to compete at the highest levels, you will need to adapt. That might mean:

• Gaining or losing size to match the realities of your weight class.

• Shifting your nutritional strategies to support your output, not your appetite.

• Changing your accessory work to suit your levers, not someone else’s Instagram routine.

• Letting go of conventional “health” or “fitness” aesthetics in favour of performance efficiency.

This is liberating — not restrictive. It means you get to stop worrying about what society expects you to look like, and start building the body your sport requires.

Building Bodies That Win

The deeper truth here is that high-level output doesn’t always look the way people expect it to. You might not have visible abs. You might not be symmetrical. You might not even look “fit” in a traditional sense. But your body will become an engine — built to perform, to endure, and to express force.

If you're a coach, your job isn’t to judge. It's to assess. To build. To adapt. To individualise.

If you're an athlete, your job is to stop trying to force your body into someone else's template. Instead, start asking: What do I need to do more of to succeed? Then build toward that.

Form follows function is more than a quote — it’s a lens for viewing the athlete’s body as an evolving response to performance demands. The more we understand it, the more precise we can be in shaping training, nutrition, and recovery around what matters most: output.

There’s room in this sport for all shapes, sizes, and backgrounds. But if you want to rise through the ranks, you’ll need to understand what the sport asks of your body — and be willing to adapt accordingly.

Train for performance. Build with intention. And let your form evolve to reflect the function you’ve earned.

What Does “Form Follows Function” Really Mean in Sport?

In elite sport, how you look is rarely the goal — but it’s often a consequence of how you train.

Over time, an athlete’s body adapts to the specific, repeated demands of their discipline. The more refined the training becomes, the more that adaptation is visible. Not because the training is aesthetic in nature — but because the body is smart. It builds what it needs to get the job done.

That’s what “form follows function” means.

It’s not an aesthetic philosophy. It’s a physiological law.

The Demands Shape the Outcome

Spend a decade sprinting, and you’ll build thick hamstrings, glutes like granite, and explosive hip mechanics. Train exclusively for Olympic lifting, and your body will prioritise trunk stability, leg drive, and crisp, explosive turnover. Row thousands of kilometres, and your torso will lengthen, your lats will dominate, and your cardiovascular engine will be absurd.

These aren’t aesthetic results — they’re functional ones. The adaptations aren’t random. They’re task-specific.

In nearly every sport, we begin to see these commonalities — trends in musculature, structure, and motor pattern development. Not because athletes are being selected for how they look, but because the same demands keep sculpting the same outcomes. Over and over again.

Efficiency Is the Real Aesthetic

In sport, efficiency is everything.

You don’t get bonus points for looking cool while doing it. You get points, reps, goals, and wins based on output. That means the athlete’s body will evolve in the direction of greatest economy and force production — and strip away anything that doesn’t serve that goal.

An efficient body in sport is one that:

• Wastes no movement

• Carries no excess tissue that limits output

• Has built just enough muscle in the right places

• Expresses strength, speed, and control with minimal internal friction

If your joints, structure, or musculature interfere with those things, performance will be limited — not because of appearance, but because of inefficiency.

When we say “form follows function,” we’re not saying athletes should look a certain way. We’re saying that when you train correctly for a specific output, the body will adapt in very predictable, sport-specific ways. The form is a by-product of the efficiency being pursued.

Coaches Need to See the Pattern — and Respect the Outlier

As coaches, we need to see these patterns clearly — but we also need to coach the individual, not the ideal.

Understanding what successful athletes in a sport typically look like helps us program intelligently. It lets us reverse-engineer the training process to ensure we’re emphasising the right adaptations — not chasing novelty for the sake of it, or letting general fitness concepts interfere with specific outcomes.

But it also means we should respect when someone doesn’t fit the mould and still performs. The outlier isn’t broken — they’re a case study in alternative efficiency.

Our job isn’t to force people into a form that looks like success. It’s to help them be successful by improving the function their unique structure can support.

Skill + Load + Repetition = Adaptation

One of the core ideas of functional training — the real kind, not the circus-act stuff — is that the most useful adaptation comes from repeated exposure to movement patterns that matter.

If you move with power, precision, and control under load, your body will get stronger and more stable where it counts. If you perform thousands of reps of low-output, disconnected, patternless exercises, you’ll get better at… not much.

This is where a lot of athletes go wrong, especially in off-season general prep phases or in misguided hypertrophy blocks. They train muscles instead of movements. They chase fatigue instead of intent. And they forget that the body only adapts to what it’s repeatedly asked to do with effort and precision.

Want your athletes to look and perform like athletes? Then get them moving like athletes — with intention, load, and frequency.

A Final Word on Appearance

You don’t need to look like an 'Olympian' to be a great athlete.

But you should understand that the way top athletes look isn’t the goal — it’s a side effect of years of training for performance with ruthless consistency and high exposure to specific demands.

When we say “form follows function,” we’re saying: Train with intent. Do what matters. Let the results show up over time.

Key Reminders for Lifters, Athletes, and Coaches

• Structure and form evolve from repeated, intentional function — not from chasing aesthetics

• Look for the patterns in elite sport, but don’t be bound by them

• Train the movement, not the muscle, unless the muscle is the limiter

• Use hypertrophy and mobility tools strategically, not randomly

• Understand that how an athlete looks is often just a reflection of what they’ve done consistently for years

The Soviet Sports Science Legacy: Building Athletes by Design

When we talk about “form follows function” in sport, there’s no greater — or more controversial — historical example than the Soviet Union’s state-sponsored approach to athlete development.

Long before Instagram coaches were talking about limb length, leverages, or optimal movement patterns, Soviet sports scientists were systematically analysing athletes at a national level. And they weren’t doing it to boost aesthetics or public health. They were doing it to win.

What emerged from that system — for better or worse — is still informing high-performance sport today.

Morphological Profiling: Science Meets Strategy

At the heart of the Soviet approach was morphological analysis: a detailed assessment of an athlete’s physical structure to determine their sporting suitability.

This included:

• Limb length (e.g. short femurs = better squatting leverage)

• Joint orientation (e.g. ankle dorsiflexion capacity for weightlifting)

• Muscle fibre distribution (slow vs. fast twitch dominance)

• Anthropometry (total height, segmental proportions, limb-to-torso ratios)

• Neuromuscular reactivity (how fast and hard someone could fire under pressure)

Based on this data, young athletes were streamed into sports where their physical traits gave them the best chance of success. The goal wasn’t just participation — it was long-term dominance. Olympic medals. Global records. National prestige.

It wasn’t an ethical utopia. But it was brutally effective.

Not Just Training — Selection

One of the critical elements of the Soviet model was that it wasn’t just about coaching better. It was about selecting who to coach for what.

Rather than try to mould everyone into a similar template, they placed athletes where they were most biomechanically and physiologically suited, and then trained them to master the demands of that sport. This was the institutionalisation of form follows function — on a national scale.

This is how a country with limited economic resources dominated Olympic lifting, wrestling, gymnastics, and track and field for decades.

What This Tells Us (and What It Doesn’t)

We don’t need to replicate the ethics or the system to learn from what it revealed.

The biggest takeaway? Elite performance in any sport tends to converge around specific structural advantages.

That doesn’t mean only certain people can succeed — it means that over time, those with certain traits will tend to rise higher, recover better, and produce more output at less physiological cost. That’s not ableist. That’s biology and physics. And if you’re a coach or athlete ignoring it, you’re not training smarter — you’re training blindly.

“If everyone in the top 10 of your sport is 5’7” and weighs 90kg, and you’re 6’4” and 81kg, you’re either about to be a unicorn… or you’re in the wrong weight class.”

What About the Outliers?

Yes, they exist. Yes, they succeed. But they are rare — and they succeed by building plans that work with their structure, not by pretending it doesn’t matter.

The point of understanding morphological trends isn’t to tell people to quit. It’s to give them a realistic roadmap for long-term performance.

If you have a structure that makes traditional squat depth hard, you might lean into specialty bars, wide stance box squats, or elevate GPP before max strength. If you’re too lean for your class, you might need to rework your nutrition and hypertrophy priorities to build muscle mass that makes you competitive.

Selection Is Dead. Individualisation Isn’t.

We’re no longer selecting athletes for sport in the same rigid, systemic ways — and that’s a good thing. Sport should be accessible to anyone who wants to train, compete, and improve.

But we can still use the underlying knowledge to train smarter.

Instead of streaming 12-year-olds into weightlifting based on wrist circumference, we can use limb ratios and build awareness to guide our choices in:

• Exercise selection

• Weight class targeting

• Technical emphasis

• Movement substitutions

• Recovery protocols

• Hypertrophy prioritisation

This isn’t exclusionary. It’s precision-based programming.

Train with Data, Not Fantasy

The Soviet legacy isn’t something we need to recreate. But it is something we should understand.

It reminds us that sport is not random. Success at the highest level tends to look a certain way — and move a certain way — because the physics of human performance don’t change.

If you want to compete at that level, you don’t have to be built like a clone. But you do need to be realistic about the demands of your sport, your structure, and how to build intelligently around it.

You’re not a machine in a system. But you are a structure under load. Train accordingly.

Form Follows Function — But That Doesn’t Mean You Don’t Belong Here

Let’s be blunt: just because we’re talking about levers, morphology, and high-performance trends doesn’t mean anyone is being told to leave the room.

There’s a real danger — in sport and in coaching — that performance insights get twisted into exclusionary narratives. That athletes who don’t “look the part” get written off before they even begin. That lifters who fall outside the norm are treated like problems to be solved — or worse, like people who don’t belong.

This article is here to call that out.

Because form following function doesn’t mean sport is only for certain bodies. It means we need to adapt intelligently — so every athlete, regardless of their build or background, gets the tools they need to succeed.

The Misuse of Performance Data

Patterns in elite performance exist. That’s a fact. Certain traits do tend to show up at the top of specific sports and weight classes.

But those patterns aren’t rules. And they should never be used to discourage participation, limit access, or tell someone they’re “not built for it.”

Morphology should be a coaching tool — not a gatekeeping metric.

When we talk about things like limb length, muscularity, or leverage advantages, we’re not trying to shut the door on people who don’t tick those boxes. We’re saying: “Let’s figure out how to work with what you’ve got. Let’s build your version of elite.”

Strongman Isn’t One Body Type

Strongman, in particular, is often misunderstood from the outside.

To many, it still looks like a sport for massive men pulling trucks and lifting stones the size of small planets. And yes — those guys exist, and they’re incredible. But strongman has also become one of the most inclusive strength sports on the planet.

We now see:

• Adaptive athletes flipping tyres

• Women pressing logs and dominating yoke walks

• Older adults using strongman training to build post-injury resilience

• Beginners with no lifting background finding community and progress

Strongman isn’t about being a type. It’s about being willing to work. To show up. To learn. To get stronger — however that looks for you.

Your Body Isn’t the Problem. Your Strategy Might Be.

If you’ve got long limbs and a narrow build, you’re going to have a different experience under a log press than someone with a short, compact structure. That’s not bad. That’s just physics.

So you train for it. You build positional strength. You hammer triceps and upper back work. You tweak technique. You don’t quit — you adapt.

If you’re 6'4" and struggling in a class full of 5'8" monsters, maybe you don’t need to shrink down — maybe you need to build up. Adjust your weight class, shift your nutrition, focus on hypertrophy and recovery.

If you’re returning after injury, childbirth, or illness, you might not hit comp numbers right away — but you can train in a way that honours where you’re at and moves you forward.

This is what good coaching looks like. Not telling people what they can’t do — but helping them discover what they can.

Coaches: This Is On Us

If you coach others, you need to be especially cautious.

It’s easy to lean on the trends and lose sight of the individual. Easy to tell someone they “don’t have the build for it” instead of doing the harder — and better — work of finding what will work for them.

If you’re relying on moulds, you’re probably not coaching. You’re copy-pasting.

Instead:

• Ask what the athlete brings to the table — structurally, emotionally, psychologically

• Identify their potential within their current build

• Adapt your cues, your programming, and your expectations accordingly

• Understand the person, not just the data

It’s not about building a perfect athlete. It’s about building the best version of that athlete.

Real Diversity in Sport Is Built by Design

Let’s stop pretending diversity happens by accident.

If we want strength sport to be truly inclusive, then we have to stop treating “high-performance” as a synonym for “conformity.”

That means:

• Creating spaces for beginners that don’t assume prior athleticism

• Programming accessible variations, scalable implements, and sustainable progressions

• Using performance trends as data points — not destinies

• Making sure that every athlete who walks through the door hears, “There’s a place for you here.”

You Don’t Need to Fit the Mould. You Just Need a Plan.

Form may follow function — but function can be adapted.

You don’t need to have the “ideal” leverages or proportions. You don’t need to look like anyone else on the platform. You just need to show up with intent — and follow a plan that respects your structure, your goals, and your potential.

If you're coaching, coach the athlete you have — not the one in your imagination. If you're lifting, lift like your body was built for it — because it was.

Strongman is for everybody. Strength is for everybody. Let’s make sure we coach like it.

The Jump: What You Need to Know About Moving from Intermediates to Opens in Strongman

There’s a point in every strongman athlete’s career where the novelty fades, and the reality sets in.

You’ve done the Novice comps. You’ve progressed through Inters. You’re strong. You’re competitive. You’re getting serious.

But now you're looking at the Open class and realising — this is a different game entirely.

Because Open class athletes aren’t just stronger. They’re built differently. They move differently. And they train with a level of intent and structure that separates the contenders from the curious.

This isn’t a bad thing. But if you’re sitting at the edge of that transition, there are some hard truths and valuable lessons you need to face head-on.

Undersized? Maybe. Underbuilt? Probably.

One of the most common realisations athletes have when stepping into Opens is this:

“I’m not just light. I’m under-muscled.”

It’s not just about weight class anymore. It’s about total muscularity, movement efficiency, and lever advantages that start to matter more and more as the implements get heavier and the fields get deeper.

The programming that helped you dominate in Inters? It was good — but it probably wasn’t designed to build you into an Open-level athlete. It got you here. But it won’t get you there.

So now, you’ve got two options:

• Keep doing what worked before and get stuck mid-pack

• Or level up everything — physically, psychologically, logistically

This Is the Line in the Sand

This transition is the moment where hobbyist energy dies — and athlete energy begins.

You can’t out-technique a 40kg strength gap. You can’t out-hype a lack of muscle mass. And you definitely can’t PR every implement if your joints are fried, your food isn’t dialled in, and you’re still winging your event prep.

If you’re serious about stepping into Opens and doing something with it, this is where your approach needs to change:

What Needs to Change to Compete at the Next Level

1. Hypertrophy Becomes Non-Negotiable

You need more muscle — in the right places. That means prioritising hypertrophy work that improves:

• Overhead stability

• Stone loading mechanics

• Yoke/bracing control

• Posterior chain density Not beach muscle. Sport-specific tissue.

2. Recovery Stops Being a Buzzword

At this level, your joints, nervous system, and soft tissue are under real stress. That means:

• Structured deloads

• Intelligent wave loading

• Actual sleep and nutritional recovery You’re not invincible. You’re just adapting — or you’re not.

3. Movement Efficiency Becomes a Skillset

Can you pick the sandbag in one clean movement? Can you clean a log without leaking tension or compressing your spine? These aren’t minor details — they’re points won or lost.

Start training your movement quality, not just your numbers.

4. Nutrition Needs to Match the Workload

You can’t grow without fuel. You can’t recover without resources. You can’t fill out your class by accident.

This is where strategic weight gain, targeted nutrition, and long-haul fuelling come into play — not just eating more for the sake of it.

5. Mindset Shifts from “Competing” to “Progressing”

You’re not just here to survive. You’re here to improve. That means being honest about your weak links, taking your training personally, and approaching every session with intent.

If Your Goal Is Performance — Not Aesthetics — Everything Changes

Let’s be real: the body of an elite strongman competitor doesn’t always look like a physique athlete. It might be asymmetrical. It might be thicker through the trunk than the abs. It might look “unhealthy” to someone judging by mainstream fitness standards.

But here’s the truth: high-level performance doesn’t always align with society’s aesthetic ideals — or even their health ideals.

That’s not permission to be reckless. It’s a reminder to train for what matters.

You’re here to lift more. Move faster. Handle heavier. You’re not here to impress the commercial gym crowd.

Case Study Mindset: Learn from the Elite

Look at the top athletes in your class. Study what they do, how they train, how they build their bodies over time. What patterns do you see?

You might find:

• Higher lean mass than you expected

• More time spent on event skill work

• A tighter, more dialled-in off-season

• A commitment to eating, sleeping, and training like it’s their job

Those are clues. Those are blueprints. You don’t have to copy them. But you do need to learn from them.

Final Thought: From “In It” to “All In”

This is the point in your career where you choose:

• Stay the same, or build something new

• Drift forward, or train with intent

• Hope for strength, or engineer it

Form follows function — but only if you train with purpose. You’re not the underdog anymore. You’re the blueprint in progress.

So eat like it. Lift like it. Recover like it. And show up like it.

Key Takeaways for Athletes & Coaches

• Look at the data: Study what elite performers in your class and sport tend to look like. It’ll help you understand the long-term demands.

• Use morphology to guide — not limit — progress: Limb length, joint structure, and natural build should inform your training, not restrict it.

• Adjust goals across levels: What worked in Novice or Inters might not be enough for Opens or pro-level comps.

• Structure your hypertrophy: If you lack muscularity in comparison to top competitors, make it a training and nutritional priority.

• Coach the person, not the ideal: Build the plan around their body — not the body you wish they had.

Form Follows Function: You Don’t Need to Fit the Mould — You Need a Plan

If you’ve been following along through the articles and insights we’ve worked through, you’ve probably noticed a theme by now:

Success in strength sport doesn’t come from fitting the mould. It comes from understanding the demands — and adapting with precision.

That’s the real meaning behind form follows function. It’s not a judgement. It’s a tool. A lens for looking at your performance, your body, and your potential with honesty.

And that’s where the magic happens.

What It Really Means

“Form follows function” started as an architectural principle, but in sport, it becomes a powerful coaching truth:

Over time, your body becomes a reflection of what it consistently does.

If you sprint, you’ll develop the traits of a sprinter. If you lift, load, press, and carry under load, your body will begin to adapt to that. If you train for strength, not aesthetics — your form will follow your function.

This isn’t about being built “right.” It’s about becoming more effective at what you’ve chosen to pursue. It’s not about looking the part — it’s about being capable in the part.

The Patterns Are There — But So Is the Flexibility

Across Olympic sport, powerlifting, strongman, and combat sports, we see repeatable trends. Wrestlers tend to have thick necks, strong hips, and dense torsos. Olympic lifters are often compact, with powerful legs and mobile shoulders. Strongman athletes are built for load-bearing — thick through the trunk, resilient, and rugged.

But these trends aren’t gatekeeping tools — they’re performance indicators. They show us what tends to win. And if we want to get better, we can learn from them without copying blindly.

You don’t need to look like the top 5 to become competitive. But you do need to ask:

• What do they have that I don’t — structurally, strategically, nutritionally?

• How can I build toward what works — while respecting how I’m built?

That’s how you progress without trying to force yourself into someone else’s template.

From Novice to Open — and Beyond

When athletes move from Intermediates to the Open class, they quickly discover that the old rules don’t apply. The numbers get bigger. The competition gets denser. The margin for error shrinks.

This is where the serious work starts. You’re not just lifting anymore — you’re building a machine.

That means:

• Prioritising hypertrophy where it matters

• Structuring recovery with intent

• Eating for output, not just aesthetics

• Choosing variations and event strategies based on your body, not just the leaderboard

• Letting go of the idea that “strong” has to look a certain way

This isn’t about becoming someone else. It’s about becoming your best-built version of yourself — brick by brick.

Inclusive ≠ Ignorant

Some people worry that talking about morphology and structure is ableist or exclusionary. It’s not.

Strongman and strength sport are for everyone. All backgrounds. All sizes. All structures.

But performance is performance. And if you want to reach your highest level, you have to train with clarity. You have to adapt your programming, lifestyle, and nutrition in a way that respects the demands of the sport and the reality of your body.

That’s not ableism. That’s coaching.

Let Go of the Fantasy. Train for the Function.

You might not have six-pack abs. You might not move like a gymnast. You might not “look” like a fitness influencer.

That’s fine.

Elite strength often looks rugged. Lived-in. Sometimes asymmetrical. Always engineered.

If your goal is real performance — to compete at a high level, to be durable, to move more weight with more confidence — you’ll need to let go of what society says your body should look like and start building what your sport actually demands.

That’s the freedom you’ve been looking for.

Final Takeaways

• You don’t need to fit a mould. But you do need to understand your own morphology, structure, and limits — and build with them in mind.

• Strongman is for everyone. But competing at the top level requires precision, intent, and a strategic approach that respects your individuality.

• Form follows function. But it doesn’t happen by accident — it happens through smart training, honest feedback, and consistency over time.

• You’re not the problem. You just need a better plan.

Ready to Work With a Coach Who Gets It?

If you’re serious about progressing — not just in the gym, but as a strength athlete — you need someone who sees more than just your lifts. Someone who understands how to work with your physical structure, your psychology, your lifestyle, and your long-term goals.

If you’re ready to build something that fits you, get in touch.

Let’s go to work.

* Online Coaching

Buy Now